Some American and European officials, in many occasions, admitted that they did wrong in destroying countries like Iraq and Libya. They show regret, yet they support demolishing other countries. The last of these “confessions” was Barack Obama’s when he said that sectarian conflicts in Iraq are in the interest of Iran; and killing the former President of Iraq Saddam Hussein was a big mistake because it was in the interest of Iran; Iran is the only one that gets benefit from the emergence of ISIL organization.

Obama said it in a press conference about Iran Nuclear Agreement, held last Wednesday. The recognition, here, was not for the purpose of sympathizing with the people of Iraq, but it is in the interest of the American perspectives.

 

European and NATO officials said months ago that the intervention in Libya by-the way it happened- and ousting the President of Libya Muammar Qaddafi without a political operation, all were a huge mistake. NATO officials excluded any immediate intervention because they do not want to face “ISIL” and terror groups that represent chaos in Libya; and their admission of their mistake does not include the fact that they demolished the country, but they supported mercenaries and militants. Obama spoke about ousting Saddam, yet he did not speak about the deliberate destruction of the Iraqi state, its institutions and army –even after Saddam- and allowing terrorists to get into the country who were the basis of the establishment of ISIL.

 

Terrorism in Iraq and Libya is designed to go down with these countries and make its institutions segmented. In the memories of American and European leaders who participated in the war, we find that going down with the country and its segmentation was the goal, not only for America but also for the groups and oppositions “brought up” in America. And so did Paul Bremer, the head of state of the internationally recognized government of Iraq, admitted that the strategy reports warned about post-war chaos, after the destruction of the state and Saddam’s ousting. However, Bush administration, upon the advice of the American made opposition, insisted on the division of the state and army. Consequently, this made a “gap” through which al-Qaeda and then ISIL entered the country.

 

Therefore, the admission of their mistake in destroying Iraq and Libya does not seem quite serious, and the proof is that these are the same countries that supported al-Nusra Front and ISIL terrorists in Syria, organizations that exist and live in chaos and in the absence of a state.

 

Most important of all is that the US Department of State, NATO and mass media in America and Europe were making propaganda for the invasion of Iraq; glorifying terrorists in Libya; and giving speeches about their commitment to proficiency and humanity. Most of them still publish reports with lies overloaded everywhere. Perhaps those who read the killers’ translated propaganda press, pay attention to the fact they participate in devastating states and bringing chaos to the country on the pretext of supporting freedoms; whereas they were making sectarianism and hatred without remorse… Do “translated texts lovers” read the remorse of the crocodiles?